The Hidden Curriculum of Youth Sports

By Regina Symons, Ph.D., BCBA-D, LBA

The Environment We Create

In my previous post, I highlighted that children are always learning from the environments we create, not just from the lessons we intend to teach. Youth sports may be one of the clearest examples of this principle. While we often think of sports as places where children develop athletic skills, they are also environments in which children are learning about effort, relationships, confidence, failure, and themselves.

Few adults shape that environment more than a coach.

Children often spend years with the same coach, seeing them multiple times each week and looking to them for instruction, encouragement, and feedback. A coach's approval can carry tremendous significance, sometimes rivaling or even exceeding that of a parent in the athletic setting. Coaches determine opportunities, establish expectations, model how to respond to success and adversity, and create the conditions under which children learn. Whether they realize it or not, they are teaching far more than the sport itself.

That influence extends beyond the words coaches choose. Children are constantly learning from where a coach directs their attention, what they notice, what they celebrate, and what they overlook. Those experiences gradually shape children's understanding of what is valued, what is expected, and where they fit within the team.

I remember watching my son's confidence change during a match in a way that, at first glance, seemed almost inexplicable. Throughout the game, his coach repeatedly praised the opposing goalkeeper after several mediocre saves. There was nothing inappropriate about acknowledging good play, and I have no reason to believe the coach intended anything negative. Yet my son received very little feedback of his own. As the game continued, I watched him become increasingly hesitant. He later shared that he began wondering whether his coach was disappointed in him and whether he was playing well enough. His performance changed, not because anyone criticized him, but because of what he believed the environment was communicating.

Experiences like these remind us that feedback is filtered through relationships. The same words can function very differently depending on the history that has been established between a coach and an athlete. A correction from a coach who has consistently demonstrated belief, encouragement, and respect is often experienced as guidance. The identical correction delivered within a relationship characterized by frequent criticism or limited positive interaction may be experienced as another indication that the child is falling short. The difference is not necessarily the feedback itself, but the meaning that feedback has acquired over time.

This is one reason great coaching involves much more than motivating children. Effective coaches identify the behaviors that contribute to success and intentionally create opportunities for those behaviors to occur. Rather than waiting to reinforce the outcome of a play, they notice the decisions, communication, persistence, and recovery that make successful outcomes more likely. In doing so, they help children experience improvement as something that results from practicing effective behaviors rather than simply possessing talent.

Over time, these repeated interactions shape far more than athletic performance. They help children develop confidence rooted in competence rather than comparison, resilience built through learning rather than perfection, and a belief that mistakes are opportunities to improve rather than evidence of failure.

Most children will eventually forget the score of today's game or even the outcome of an entire season. What often remains are the beliefs they developed about themselves while participating in that environment. Coaches certainly teach sports, but they also help shape the environments in which children learn who they are, how they respond to challenges, and what they believe they are capable of becoming. Those lessons may be the ones that last the longest.

Previous
Previous

The Executive Function Question Most Parents Are Asking—And the One They Should Be Asking Instead

Next
Next

The Evidence We Collect